TIG NG KONG.
SECRET
Sir,
Eng on 92610/1/32 Secret.
75
36
Downing Street,
11
December, 1932.
:
I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt
of kr.Southorn's despatch of the 27th of October, 1932,
regarding the case of Sung Man Cho alias Nguyen Ai Quoc,
with which was enclosed for verification a copy of a
paraphrase of my cypher telegram No.124 of the 8th of
October, 1931, and to inform you that the word "not"
in the sentence: "His coming to England would not be
objected to by the Home Office" in the paraphrase
forwarded, is, as was suspected, a mistake.
2. There is no longer in existence any copy of the telegraphic groups sent, but a copy of the original
message enciphered is still available. A close
paraphrase of it reads "Home Office most unlikely to agree to Nguyen coming to England", and from this it
appears that in order to make the sense of the messa e
as sent the sme as that of the paraphrase forwarded with the despatch under reply, it would have been necessary for the words "most likely" to have been enciphered instead of the words "most unlikely". In view of the
clarity of the sentence in question, that seems very im-
probable. It therefore seems almost certain that the
mistake arose when the paraphrase of the telegram was made in Hong Kong.
3. I should be glad to know whether the
misunderstanding to which reference was made in the
LOVERNOR
SIR WILLIAM P3L, K.C.M.C., K.B.E.,
&G.,
&C..
&c.,
first
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.